Monthly Archives: November 2014

Happy Thanksgiving! A Bronze Turkey’s Photographic Portrait, ca. 1880

IMG pets blog_0006   Time has faded this little carte-des-visite, but it’s such a remarkable image that I had to add it to my collection. The inscription on the front (written on the negative before printing) is “bronze turkey gobbler.”  Yes, someone touched up the eye with a dot of ink, a practice that I often see in faded albumen prints like this one.

According to the Livestock Conservancy, the bronze turkey breed developed from crosses between turkeys transported to America by colonists and our indigenous wild turkeys.  This fellow has a big breast, but his stance reminds me of the wild turkeys I sometimes see strolling along the wooded edge of cornfields in the fall. He was photographed outdoors, standing in front of a fence, which is unusual for cdvs.  Of course, bringing a turkey into a photographer’s studio would have been a mighty task!

What makes this picture especially interesting, however, is the text on the back. Someone wrote the following: “Look at me through a magnifying glass if you want to see me as natural as Life.”  The message suggests that the original photograph showed a level of detail that someone found remarkable.  The phrase “natural as Life” shows up in conversations about photography at the time, and it suggests that the image was considered to be especially faithful.

Below the text is the statement that the photograph is the “Property of T. Walter & Sons, West Chester Penna” along with the note that the image was taken “DIRECT from the NEGATIVE” by “PAXSON  ARTIST,” also of West Chester.

IMG pets blog_0007Who were the Walters?   A little research shows that “T. Walter & Sons” was probably Townsend Walter and his sons Townsend and Charles.  Townsend Walter, born 1815, was a member of a large extended Quaker  family in Chester County.  “T. Walter & Sons” shows up in the West Chester city directory of 1879 among the farmers who “took their mail” in town.  Members of the Walters clan, including one of the two Townsends, were founders of chapters of the Patrons of Husbandry (the Grange) in 1873. The Walters were known for their prize-winning “Chester White” pigs, a breed that actually was developed in Chester County, Pennsylvania.

I can’t find any information on the Walters’ turkey-husbandry activities.  However, the fact that their name is on the card suggests to me that it was used as an advertising trade card.  There were several photographers with the surname “Paxson” working in West Chester starting in 1876 and working through the 1880s, so the best guess for this cdv is around 1880, late for the portrait format but just the right size for a trade card.  That the Walter family farmed under the name of “T. Walter & Sons” suggests their orientation toward commerce.

So this “Bronze Turkey Gobbler” had his portrait made to advertise the family’s agricultural business.   I surmise that they raised high quality animals for meat.  Mr. Gobbler may have made someone an impressive holiday feast, or he may have been prized as breeding stock and spared a premature end.  In either event, his portrait is an interesting rarity.  I mean, how many Victorian turkey portraits have you seen?

Happy Thanksgiving!

2 Comments

Filed under pet portraiture, pets, poultry, Thanksgiving, turkeys

Dr. Byles Dog Hospital, Los Angeles, 1917

Blog scans_0014“Dr. Austin B. Byles, of Los Angeles, Cal., has issued a neat little folder, describing and illustrating his new dog and cat hospital, which is admirably equipped for treating and boarding canine and feline pets.”  This item appeared in the September 1917 issue of the American Journal of Veterinary Medicine.  It’s notable because small animal medicine was neglected in this journal, which emphasized the bread-and-butter practice of livestock care until the 1920s.  Pets were generally an afterthought among vets, who were not trained in their care.  Most pet owners did their own home doctoring.  (I’ll discuss more about home doctoring in future posts.)  The exception to this was in big cities — New York, Philadelphia, and here in Los Angeles — where small animal practice was developing into a niche market with a well-to-do clientele.

This is the brochure described in the JVM.  It offers both interior and exterior views of the Dog Hospital, and looking closely at it reveals some important things about the  emergence of small animal veterinary hospitals in the United States.

Dr. Austin Beuzeville Biles was born in Ealing, London, England in 1878 or 1881 and emigrated to the United States via Victoria, British Columbia, in 1905.  In 1912, in his Declaration of Intention to pursue American citizenship (he was finally naturalized in 1918), he listed his occupation as “Veterinary Surgeon.” He opened a clinic in Long Beach and also bred Airdale Terriers, registering some of his studs with the American Kennel Club between 1904 and 1911.

Around 1915, Dr. Byles made a sudden sharp career shift away from veterinary practice: he tried to become an oil-lands developer. This venture seems to have failed; by 1917, Dr. Byles returned to his first occupation.  This was when he opened Dr. Byles Dog Hospital and put out this brochure, announcing that he had “resumed practice as a canine and feline specialist.Blog scans_0015

The brochure offered a view of the Dog Hospital, which seems to have been in a house converted to the purpose.  Dr. Byles’ residence was apparently on the second floor, and the spacious, fenced back yard contained a kennel building for boarding dogs.

In 1922, The North American Veterinarian published another short piece about Dr. Byles’ practice. By the 1920s, the profession was paying more attention to pets because urban vets were rapidly losing their primary income source, the urban horse.  This second article made special note of Dr. Byles’ operating room, which  contained “a steel operating table, electric sterilizer and instrument cabinets.”

Why were these features notable? Traditional large-animal practice typically took place in barns or stables, and vets made little effort to recreate sterile environmental conditions except for swabbing wound and incision sites  with disinfectants.  In comparison, Dr. Byles directly paralleled his methods to those of “human hospitals,” including adherence to accepted “principles of sterilization” and the use of anesthetics for all operations.  He depicted himself in a white  operating room, wearing a white smock.  His assistant wore a white dress and a cap.  The dog’s hurt leg is being bathed in a white enamel basin and dressed with a roll of sterile white cotton.  The brochure pointed out Dr. Byles’ concern with modern sanitation in other ways, too.  The kennels were painted white, dogs were fed in white enamel basins and small dogs received “their own white blankets to sleep on.”

The brochure’s pictures and text show that Dr. Austin Byles was aware that increasing numbers of pet owners regarded their charges as members of the family who were entitled to modern standards of care similar to what they expected to receive at their own doctors’ offices.  By the mid-1920s, more practices began to look like Dr. Byles Dog Hospital although small-animal small animal veterinary practice still had a long way to go.

If you would like to learn more about the rise of small animal veterinary practice, turn to Susan D. Jones’ fine book Valuing Animals: Veterinarians and Their Patients in Modern America (Johns Hopkins University Press, 2003).  I also discuss how people home-doctored their cats and dogs in my book Pets in America.

 

Leave a comment

Filed under cats, dogs, pets, small animal medicine, veterinary history, veterinary medicine